top of page
MySstical-MindSet-Innovations-LLC-and-MGMG-—-MySstic-Gully-Muszik-Group-LLC-logo
JOIN THE CIRCLE

Hatshepsut

Writer: mgmuszik
mgmuszik
Jul 3
6 min read






The Erased Pharaoh: They Took Chisels to Her Name — the Chisel Marks Kept It

There is a kind of hatred that only power attracts, and it doesn't arrive while you're alive. It waits until you can't answer. Then it comes for your name. Today the archive teaches you about a woman who ruled the mightiest civilization on Earth for twenty years — so well, so peacefully, so magnificently that the men who came after her decided the safest thing to do with her memory was to cut it out of the stone. Here's what they learned, and what you need to learn from it: stone remembers being cut.

THE HISTORY

Around 1479 BCE, in Egypt's Eighteenth Dynasty, a royal widow named Hatshepsut was handed the standard woman's assignment: babysit the throne. Her husband — Thutmose II, who was also her half-brother, because royalty — died young, and the heir, Thutmose III, was an infant born to a lesser wife. Custom made her regent: hold the kingdom, raise the boy, hand it over, disappear. That was the whole job description.

Within about seven years she tore it up. Hatshepsut had herself crowned pharaoh — not queen, not regent, king — taking the full throne name Maatkare and the complete powers of the office, ruling as senior co-ruler beside the child. She claimed the god Amun as her true father, a divine-birth story carved into her monuments as legitimacy armor. And in the official art, something remarkable happens: her image transforms, step by step, from a queen in a gown standing off to the side into a full pharaoh — bare-chested, broad-shouldered, wearing the ceremonial false beard that every pharaoh wore as a symbol of the office. Scholars still debate exactly why she chose that presentation; what's documented is that Egypt's iconography had no vocabulary for a woman holding supreme power, so she made the vocabulary bend.

And here is what the record shows about her reign, the part that makes everything that follows unforgivable: it worked. For roughly two decades Egypt under Hatshepsut was prosperous and largely at peace. She launched one of the most famous trade expeditions in Egyptian history to the land of Punt, bringing back gold, ebony, incense, and living myrrh trees. She raised two obelisks at Karnak that weighed on the order of 450 tons apiece. She built on a scale few pharaohs ever matched, crowned by her mortuary temple at Deir el-Bahri — still considered one of the architectural wonders of the ancient world. The arts flourished so hard under her that Egyptologists credit her reign with influencing Egyptian art for the next thousand years. The historian James Henry Breasted called her "the first great woman in history of whom we are informed."

Then she died, around 1458 BCE. And roughly twenty years later — let that number sit, twenty years, this was no grief-stricken rage — a campaign began. Across Egypt, her images and her names were systematically hacked out of monument walls. Her cartouches were recut with the names of her father, her husband, her stepson — the woman surgically replaced with the men around her. She was left out of the king lists, the official record of who had ruled. Later pharaohs never learned she existed. For three thousand years, one of the greatest rulers Egypt ever produced was simply gone.

Why? The record points at Thutmose III as the initiator, and for a century historians told it as a revenge story — the seething stepson finally destroying the "usurper." One Egyptologist of that era called her the "vilest type of usurper" — and notice, daughter, that the venom there belongs to the modern historian, not the ancient record. Scholarship since the 1960s dismantled the revenge tale: the twenty-year gap makes personal hatred hard to sustain, and Thutmose III had spent her reign not imprisoned but being trained into one of Egypt's greatest generals. The motives most scholars now weigh are colder and more familiar to this archive: securing his own son's succession against any rival line, and — as some Egyptologists have argued — erasing the precedent. Not the woman. The possibility of another one.

Now the ending they didn't plan. In the nineteenth century, scholars deciphering the walls at Deir el-Bahri hit a puzzle: inscriptions with feminine grammar wrapped around images of a male king. The chisels had taken her figure, but Egyptian is a gendered language, and nobody had scrubbed the she out of the sentences. Her erasure had left a her-shaped hole, and the hole testified. Then in the 1920s, excavators found the pits where her smashed statues had been dumped — and piece by piece, museums reassembled her, colossal and enthroned. And one more detail, the one this archive will not let you skip: Egyptologists note that in dark recesses of shrines, in places no ordinary eye would ever reach, her cartouche and figure were sometimes left completely intact. Even the erasers could not bring themselves to blind the gods to her. They hid her from the people and left her burning in the dark.

THE RECENT EVIDENCE — Added 2025

The archive is living, and this entry moved while you were alive. For a century, the smashed statues found dumped in pits at Deir el-Bahri were read as proof of a hate-frenzy — eyes gouged, heads lopped, the work of rage. In 2025, a researcher at the University of Toronto went back through the original 1920s excavation records, fragment by fragment, and found a different pattern: many statues were broken at the neck, waist, and knees — the standard cuts of what Egyptologists call "ritual deactivation," a protocol male pharaohs' statues also received to neutralize their power — and much of the remaining damage came from later generations quarrying the stone for reuse.

But hold the receipt steady, because the same research confirms the crime: across Egypt, her names and images were deliberately, systematically hacked out of the walls, and that campaign traces to Thutmose III. So the correction doesn't acquit anyone — it makes the story colder. Not one man's tantrum against one woman. A system calmly performing its maintenance: deactivate the statues by protocol, delete the woman from the record by policy. This archive gives you the update the moment the scholarship does, because that's the difference between a shrine and an archive. Shrines protect their stories. Archives correct them — and get stronger every time.

THE RECEIPTS

  • The monuments themselves — Deir el-Bahri, Karnak, and sites across Egypt, where the recut cartouches and hacked reliefs are physically visible; the erasure is carved into the evidence.

  • Catharine Roehrig et al. (eds.), Hatshepsut: From Queen to Pharaoh (Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2005) — the major scholarly catalog on her reign, her kingly self-presentation, and the erasure campaign; the Met's teams excavated and reassembled her statues.

  • Jun Yi Wong, "The Afterlife of Hatshepsut's Statuary," Antiquity (2025) — the new research distinguishing ritual "deactivation" and stone reuse at Deir el-Bahri from the confirmed, systematic hacking of her names and images across Egypt.

  • The scholarly motive debate — revenge theory (early 20th c.) vs. succession politics and precedent-erasure (post-1960s scholarship, argued by Egyptologists including Peter Dorman and Donald Redford). This archive reports the debate as a debate.

GO DEEPER

Every link free — go verify me:

THE SACRED RESPONSE

Now bring it home, because this was never just about Egypt.

Somebody in your line was Hatshepsut'd. Maybe she ran the household, the business, the church kitchen, the whole family — and the story got retold until a man stood where she stood. Maybe it was you: the idea that grew legs after it left your mouth and came back wearing someone else's name. The campaign never ended, daughter. It just got subtler than chisels.

But you learned three things in the stone today. One: they don't erase failures. Nobody spends twenty years of labor scratching out a woman who didn't matter — erasure is a receipt of power. Two: erasure is lazy at the edges. It leaves feminine grammar in the sentences, chisel marks in the granite, a her-shaped silence that testifies louder than the wall. Three: even her enemies left her face intact where they believed the divine was watching.

So tonight's work: be your own dark recess. Take one page and record a truth about a woman in your line — or about yourself — exactly as it happened, with her name on it, before the family retelling sands her out of it. Write it plainly: who did the thing, who took the credit, what the stone should have said. Keep it where your papers that matter live. You are not being petty. You are being an archive. And say her name out loud once — because Hatshepsut waited three thousand years for someone to do that, and the wait itself is the lesson: the truth doesn't die when they cut it. It waits in the dark, intact, for the excavation.

They would rather you burn quietly than stand carved in the record. Be carved.

The full excavation rite for this entry — the lineage-record practice and the naming ceremony — lives inside the Shedding Circle.




Comments

bottom of page